{"id":1225,"date":"2010-05-04T16:31:52","date_gmt":"2010-05-04T20:31:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lettersandsodas.com\/books\/?p=1225"},"modified":"2010-05-04T16:31:52","modified_gmt":"2010-05-04T20:31:52","slug":"blackout-by-connie-willisspectra-random-house-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lettersandsodas.com\/books\/blackout-by-connie-willisspectra-random-house-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Blackout by Connie WillisSpectra (Random House), 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The premise of this book is excellent: it&#8217;s 2060 and we&#8217;ve figured out time travel, so historians, instead of just spending their time in libraries and archives and museums, head back to the past to witness history first-hand. Of course, there&#8217;s the usual time travel question: can they influence events, and what&#8217;s to stop them from doing so? Well, it seems like there are &#8220;divergence points&#8221;: moments where the course of history could have changed so much if things had gone differently, moments in history that are too volatile, moments that won&#8217;t let a time traveler in. If you try to get to one of these places, there&#8217;ll be slippage: you&#8217;ll end up in a different time, or a different place, which most historians think is a good thing: a feature rather than a bug, as it were. But at least one theorist thinks that slippage is a symptom of a problem, a sign that something big is wrong and that time travelers are messing with things they shouldn&#8217;t be messing with.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, historians keep on traveling to the past, and there&#8217;s lots of great detail around this. Oxford, in this book, has a whole time travel lab plus several supporting departments: props and wardrobe teams to get historians the money and papers and clothes they&#8217;ll need to be, say, an American reporter covering Dunkirk, or a shopgirl in London during the blitz; a whole fleet of antique vehicles so you can learn to drive a 1940s Bentley or pilot a boat. There are even &#8220;implants&#8221; and &#8220;tablets&#8221; for languages, accents, and historical knowledge&#8212; not that there isn&#8217;t also an awful lot of good old-fashioned book-based research involved. And then there&#8217;s the great detail of the scenes set in the past: those parts of the book feel like solid historical fiction, <em>smart<\/em> historical fiction, concerned with detail and scene-setting and history, but with enough characterization and plot to make for a really satisfying read.<\/p>\n<p>So: this is the story of several different time travelers who are doing their research on WWII-era Britain. There&#8217;s Merope, who wants to see VE day but ends up working as a maid in Warwickshire, looking after evacuated children; there&#8217;s Polly, who ends up in London during the Blitz; there&#8217;s Michael, who wants to study ordinary people who become heroes, including the fishermen who helped with the evacuation at Dunkirk. They all get to 1940s England, but once they&#8217;re there, things don&#8217;t always go according to plan. The perspective of the book shifts from chapter to chapter&#8212;which feels a bit manipulative (you want to keep reading &#8217;cause you want to get back to that other plot thread!) but is also exciting; chapters often end with cliffhangers&#8212;as, indeed, does the whole book, which is actually the first part of a two-book work. I fear I might have to re-read it in the fall when the second part comes out, but that wouldn&#8217;t necessarily be a bad thing, since I pretty much entirely enjoyed this book.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The premise of this book is excellent: it&#8217;s 2060 and we&#8217;ve figured out time travel, so historians, instead of just spending their time in libraries and archives and museums, head back to the past to witness history first-hand. Of course, there&#8217;s the usual time travel question: can they influence events, and what&#8217;s to stop them [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fiction"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lettersandsodas.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lettersandsodas.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lettersandsodas.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lettersandsodas.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lettersandsodas.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1225"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lettersandsodas.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1225\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lettersandsodas.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lettersandsodas.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lettersandsodas.com\/books\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}