Cooking, plus thoughts about choosing books

It is summer, which means mountains of vegetables from my CSA farm share are filling my fridge every week. I was behind on cooking and eating all these veggies for a few week, but the other day I decided to have a great big fridge clean-out, in which I threw out everything that was past salvaging and stopped feeling guilty about it. Now that I’m not totally overwhelmed by veg—I still have a lot but it’s all sorted and organized and I have a list on the fridge telling me what I have —I am remembering how good Farmer John’s Cookbook is for CSA season. It’s full of veggie-centric recipes, and I’ve managed to find a few lately that are pleasingly simple, not boring but “I already have all the ingredients in the house.” Recent highlights: Last weekend Megan and I had dinner together and cooked the kohlrabi hash, which is gingery and surprising and great, even if the grating of the kohlrabi can be tedious. Last week at home I made “summer squash with a crispy cornmeal coating”: normally any recipes for breading and frying things seem like too much work, but this was simple and delicious and a perfect side dish. The other day I made some “broccoli with Asian-style dressing,” which is to say with vinegar and soy sauce and toasted sesame oil and garlic and ginger and peanut oil. And last night I made the Swiss chard with pine nuts and raisins and my boyfriend made us some cheeseburgers, and that plus white whine was the perfect summer dinner. Next up: curried rice and cucumber salad with walnuts and raisins.

Meanwhile, in non-vegetable-related news, a few recent conversations at work have been making me think about books/reading/how we choose what we read. Conversation one: someone was saying something about 1984, and how he felt surprised by how many details of the book had stayed with him through the decades, and then mentioned he’d recently reread Catch-22, another book whose details had stuck in his head since he first read it at age 15, and which surprised him on re-reading by being even better than he remembered it—and he’d remembered it as being quite good. (This made me wonder if I should also re-read Catch-22, which I only read because I had to read it for a college class. I liked it, but maybe I’d like it more now?) Another person in the room chimed in with, “wow, I don’t know when I last read a novel,” which prompted the Catch-22 reader and I both to say “you should!” Though of course, well, maybe he shouldn’t. If reading intelligent non-fiction (which I think is what this person reads: my impression is that his choices lean more towards the business/tech side of things than to general interest or history, though I might be wrong there) is what brings him joy, well, then, have at it, right? I might see something like Pull: The Power of the Semantic Web to Transform Your Business sitting on the sidewalk and pass it by (I *did* see it and pass it by the other day, actually, though not without briefly considering picking it up), but that doesn’t mean someone shouldn’t be reading it.

Conversation two: I was carrying To Say Nothing of the Dog in my hand on the way into the office one morning, and someone asked what I was reading. When I explained it, he said, possibly just matter-of-factly, or possibly a little dismissively, “oh, genre fiction,” then asked how I’d heard about it. So I said I’d heard about another book by the author on a book blog I read, to which his response was to ask if I read a lot of book blogs, to which my response was “yeah, I guess.” At which point he advised me to follow my own instincts. Which made me laugh, because of course I do, and I imagine most people who read book blogs do. It’s exciting to find out about promising-sounding books from blogs, sometimes especially exciting if the book is outside of my usual reading interests and therefore probably not something I would have discovered all on my own. But there are still lots of books I read about/hear about, whether on book blogs or elsewhere, that I have absolutely no interest in picking up—and I don’t see how reading book blogs is any different from reading the NY Times Book Review or book reviews in the New Yorker or Publishers Weekly (which I used to LOVE flipping through when Megan worked at Scholastic and would bring home old copies from the office). And of course, there are still times when I pick up a book just because it catches my eye, not because I’ve heard about it—or its author—anywhere.

All of which is to say: I sure do like having an ever-growing and ever-eclectic reading list. It’s exciting to me—and I’m OK with the fact that I’ll never read everything I want to read. (My boyfriend and I talk about this periodically. He tends to worry about whether a given book is worth his time, whereas I don’t really think about that. I mean, I guess I do think about it: there are, as I’ve said, books I’m entirely uninterested in ever reading. But once I hit the point of deciding that a given book might be interesting or fun, then I read it when it seems like I’m in the right mood for it.) What about you? How do you choose your books? Do you think reading book blogs has changed what you read?


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

One response to “Cooking, plus thoughts about choosing books”

  1. Danya Avatar

    Interesting thoughts of yours!

    I agree with your reaction to the guy who told you to follow/trust your instincts – whether one is prepared to entertain any suggestion, or mix discernment with flexibility, there’s always potential for benefitting from someone else’s recommendations. And to be dismissive of book blogs is like saying one should never join a bookclub, though maybe he would suggest that too 😉

    I think I’m slightly more on the side of your boyfriend. I often don’t finish a book if it doesn’t interest me – there are far too many good ones out there that I could be getting to, but I do slightly worry that I might not find them (or enough of them) among all the average ones that are being published these days. I know they’re out there because now and then I do come across one. (I noticed this concern when I was moving the position of the ‘Reading 2010’ list on my blog – retyping the list and noticing the books I’d read so far this year, it felt as if I’d wasted time by reading certain ones that turned out not to be interesting or pleasing.)

    I choose books to read in various ways – I read the work of certain authors whatever they write (and only once have been intensely disappointed, by a fantasy author’s sci-fi story), I try to be open-minded to the reviews of the bookclub I’m in, I follow up interesting-sounding suggestions from the radio or casual conversation or people whose opinion I trust. One of the benefits of the bookclub that I’m part of, the other members confirm now and then, is that it encourages them to read novels they wouldn’t otherwise have read. I don’t quite agree – I don’t see that reading a wide range of novels is necessarily a good thing, if you don’t come to enjoy the new genres. I think it’s perfectly acceptable if someone were to read only crime novels, for example, if that’s what they enjoy (as you said in relation to the intelligent non-fiction reader).

    I’m not a huge fan of ‘formal’ reviews (I don’t consider your posts to be in that form), and so now that I think about it I would say no, reading the few book blogs that I do read hasn’t really changed what I read. But it has added to the pool of suggestions, so, if one includes ‘improved’ in ‘changed’, the answer would also be yes, because the few book blogs (and some other bogs) have enhanced for me the possibility of finding those elusive good books.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *